If it doesn’t, Kashmir politics will be heading towards disaster?
Obviously, Kashmir unrest got hugely influenced and catalysed by the interventional policies of the federal government during last two years regarding food choice and other social and religious matters of a particular section of the society in the country. The policies being pushed rudely in the garb of promulgations and implemented with vindictive approach almost negate the secular and democratic concept that was promised to millions of Indians in 1947. The unfinished agenda of resolving the status of Kashmir (whole Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh under the occupation of India, Pakistan, and China) is more susceptible to such coercive influences and Kashmir valley being the epicenter bears most of the brunt. The induced stalemate in talks has made the tempers and feelings more volatile. People of Kashmir are unable to understand the reverse transformation of the agenda of promises, reconciliation, and simple talks. From plebiscite promise in 1947 at historic Lalchowk by none less than first statesman Prime minister Jawahar Lal Nehru , ‘sky is the limit’ assurance by Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao in 1995 at Burkina Faso, Insaniyat (Humanity), Jamhuriyat (Democracy) and Kashmiriyat doctrine by Atal Bihari Vajpayee to Vikas (development) theory of Prime Minister Modi and off late his new addition to Kashmir political lexicon ‘tourism or terrorism’ has baffled Kashmiri people over the years. They are unable to trust anyone, anymore. Even international agencies like United Nations have lost credibility in Kashmir. And this situation of reversing the promises in a tactful and gradual manner compounded the situation for the worse. A trust deficit starts creeping into the minds of stakeholders resulting in reinvigorated resolve for pursuing unrest and only unrest!